Saturday, August 22, 2020

Family Assessment and Nursing Process Essay

As indicated by Stanhope and Lancaster (2001), a family nursing appraisal is viewed as the foundation for family nursing intercessions and is utilized in a deliberate manner for the ID of the family’s formative stages and hazard factors. There are numerous apparatuses accessible that give rules to how to best become acquainted with a family and to decide their qualities and shortcomings. One such instrument is the Friedman Family Assessment apparatus which gives a rule to attendants to meet a family. Hypothesis is likewise a fundamental instrument while surveying a family since it is hypothesis that most intensely clarifies clinical circumstances and gives rules when working families (Friedman, Bowden, and Jones, 2003). The hypothesis that will be applied to family appraisal in this paper is the auxiliary useful hypothesis. The auxiliary useful hypothesis perceives the cooperation between relatives inside their inward and outer condition (Friedman et al., 2003). When an extens ive family appraisal is finished and medical problems are recognized, the nursing procedure is actualized so as to render care that is basic for helping every relative to accomplish an ideal degree of wellbeing (Gilliss and Davis, 1993). In consistence with HIPPA guidelines of exacting classification, the invented name of Listo will be utilized to distinguish the family that is evaluated in this report. The Friedman Family evaluation model will be followed as a rule to examine the family’s distinguishing information, the structure-capacity of the relatives, and how the family handles pressure, adapting and adjustment. Ultimately, key appraisal information will be utilized in the nursing procedure so as to survey, analyze, plan, mediate, and assess a family member’s analysis. The Listo family is a more distant family that is made out of a conjugal dyad, their two grown-up children, the maternal grandma and the son’s sweetheart who is in her second trimester of pregnancy. The couple have been hitched for a long time and their children are ages 23 and 26years old. The spouse distinguishes his ethnicity as Italian. His essential language is English and heâ was brought up in California. His folks relocated to the United States from Italy in the mid 1940’s. Since they relocated at such a youthful age, his licenses have acculturated to the American lifestyle, yet at the same time feel unequivocally about their social legacy (McCallion, Janicki, and Grant-Griffin, 1997). The spouse recognizes her ethnicity as Caucasian. She was likewise brought up in California. Both a couple experienced childhood in the Catholic confidence and went to chapel fundamentally on vacations. In their mid-thirties, they acknowledged Christ as their own hero and became c onceived again Christians; first the spouse and afterward a couple of months after the fact the wife. The spouse possesses a canvas business for private properties and the wife deals private land and works for a nearby land organization. They are viewed as a lower-working class family. The major distinctive qualities of the lower-white collar class family are decency, accomplishment, difficult work and trustworthiness (Friedman et al., 2003). Neither spouse nor wife has a professional education. Both are persevering and are glad that they have given monetarily to their children who have both gotten an advanced degree. Beforehand, the multi year old child and his better half were living respectively and were a double pay family. The two of them moved in with his folks when the sweetheart needed to leave her place of employment in view of intricacy she endured during the initial not many months of her pregnancy. They intend to wed once they are monetarily steady. The child is as of now filling in as a physical wellness mentor for a school football crew and contributes monetarily to the family. In June of this current year, the multi year old child graduated with a Bachelor’s certificate and moved back home. He is as of now searching for work and would like to move out inside the year. The grandma is 76 years of age and has lived with the family for as far back as year because of the movement of her COPD. FAMILY STRUCTURE As per Friedman, Bowden and Jones (2003), the idea of examining the structure of a family alludes to how the family is composed, how the parts are masterminded and how they identify with one another. The four fundamental structures of the family are jobs, values, correspondence procedures and force and dynamic. The job hypothesis is the structure that is the focal point of the Listo family. Family jobs have a basic influence in the association of the family and in view of this the family nurture must comprehend job connections so as to have the option to advance solid job practices and distinguish job issues (Friedman et al., 2003). As indicated by the job hypothesis, a relative will assume numerous jobs in a family. There are both formal and casual jobs inside the family structure. Formal family jobs incorporate the more evident jobs, for example, mother-spouse, father-husband, and father-child. The more subtle jobs are that of encourager, harmonizer, initiator, substitute, compromiser, and so on. Casual jobs are bound to be founded on character than age or sex (Kievit, 1968). Inside the Listo family, the spouse wife dyadic relationship is complimentary displayed by a differentiating relationship (Friedman et al., 2003). As the proper job of spouse, Mrs. Listo is the main prevailing character and settles on the majority of the choices in the family including choices about the kids and the family unit accounts. She is additionally the primary wellspring of salary for the family. As the proper job of spouse, Mr. Listo is to a greater extent an adherent, a position he gives off an impression of being content with. As indicated by Friedman, Borden, and Jones (2003), there is a solid component of reliance between the couple in a complimentary relationship. This is valid for the Listo family; they have a nearby bond and appear to be OK with their significant other spouse give and take relationship. Appraisal of the Listo family uncovered various casual family jobs. The grandma assumes the casual job of acknowledgment searcher. As clarified by Friedman, Bowden, Jones (2003), the acknowledgment searcher puts forth an admirable attempt to cause to notice self. When interrogating the grandma regarding different individuals from the family, she kept on turning each discussion back to a subject that included her as the middle figure. The two Listo young men have the casual job of overseer. During the meeting the grandma kept on requesting that the young men get her handbag, discover her glasses, and bring her some tea. At the point when the young men were out of the room, the grandma whined about how languid the young men are and that they don’t comprehend her condition and what she’s proceeding with her COPD. The spouse has the casual job ofâ follower. He obliges the desires of the family and if there is a disagreement about how or what to do, he just tunes in and possibly takes part in the discussion in the event that he is straightforwardly posed an inquiry. The spouse has the casual job of Initiator-Contributor. She rouses the youngsters with thoughts and approaches to achieve objectives and take care of issues. As per Kantor and Lehr (1975), the Initiator-Contributor causes development in the family and is portrayed by the commencement of activity. The sweetheart has the casual job as the encourager. She offers praises openly and regularly. She gives off an impression of being truly keen on tuning in to other people and she once in a while causes to notice herself. â€Å"The more noteworthy the apparent lucidity of job desire the higher the nature of job enactment† (Friedman et al., 2003, p. 324). While assessing the nature of every job, it was resolved that the relatives plainly comprehend their jobs and are content with the desire that is joined to every job. The special case was the multi year old child, who showed job strife with his obligations as guardian for the grandma. In the wake of having the opportunity of school life, it has been hard for the multi year old to be living back at home and having explicit desires put upon him. As per Friedman, Bowden, and Jones (2003), the most youthful child is encountering intersender job struggle, which happens when there are clashing assumptions about the institution of a job. FAMILY HEALTH FUNCTION As indicated by the Structure-Function hypothesis, a capacity is a result or outcome of the structure. Capacity is depicted as being what the family does. Friedman, Bowden, and Jones (2003) depict 5 explicit capacities: emotional, socialization, conceptive, financial and human services. The focal point of the Listo family appraisal is the capacity of social insurance. The Friedman Assessment Model was utilized as a guide. As per Friedman, Bowden, and Jones (2003), wellbeing practices and social insurance administrations are very changed from family to family. Families are various in the manner they conceptualize wellbeing and ailment and when to look for medicinal services. The Listo family values how sound they have been. Up to this point, the family had what they depicted as â€Å"catastrophic† clinical protection. The mother and father are both self employed entities and don't have protection through their work environment. Their protection strategy conveyed a $1,500 deductible. This high deductible deflected the family from visiting the specialist for standard registration. The Listo family falls under the umbrella of â€Å"underinsured† which has kept them from getting exhaustive social insurance. With the wife’s land doing so well over the recent years, the Listos currently have a protection plan that covers standard registration and dental consideration also. The multi year old child gets wellbeing inclusion from his manager and the sweetheart has private protection. With such huge numbers of years without human services get to, the Listo family has not taken part in wellbeing the board. As indicated by Friedman, Bowden, and Jones (2003), the

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.